United States v. Muhammad

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 1, 2011
• Docket: 11-6150
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6150

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Pete Smith, a/k/a Jose,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (2:93-cr-00117-WO-1)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pete Noble Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Pete Noble Muhammad appeals the district court’s

denial of his motion to terminate his supervised release under

18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2010). We have

reviewed the district court’s decision and have found no abuse

of discretion. See United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282

(4th Cir. 1999) (reviewing district court’s termination of

defendant’s supervised release for abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Muhammad, No. 2:93-cr-00117-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan.

24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED