United States v. Mouzone
This text of United States v. Mouzone (United States v. Mouzone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7671
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHAUNCY DONZELLOS MOUZONE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CR-97-302, CA-00-1795-3)
Submitted: April 28, 2003 Decided: May 21, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chauncy Donzellos Mouzone, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Chauncy Mouzone, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and
conclude Mouzone has not made a substantial showing of the denial
of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S.
, 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)
(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mouzone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mouzone-ca4-2003.