United States v. Mosley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2009·No. 08-6735·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MONTE CLAY MOSLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00016-jpj-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monte Clay Mosley, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Monte Clay Mosley appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of an order granting

relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Mosley’s motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Mosley, No. 3:95-cr-00016-jpj-

1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mosley, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Mosley (United States v. Mosley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related