United States v. Morton

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2007·No. 06-5264·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0285n.06 Filed: April 20, 2007

No. 06-5264

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) v. ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CHARLES EDWARD MORTON, ) EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ) Defendant-Appellant. )

Before: SUTTON and COOK, Circuit Judges; and GWIN, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. Charles Edward Morton appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to

suppress evidence seized during a search of a residence located at 299 Picadome Park Drive in

Lexington, Kentucky. Having reviewed the record, the applicable law, and the parties’ briefs, we

determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district

court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

* The Honorable James S. Gwin, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morton, (6th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Morton (United States v. Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.