United States v. Morton

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Morton

222 F. App'x 510

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2007·No. No. 06-5264·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Edward Morton appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of a residence located at 299 Picadome Park Drive in Lexington, Kentucky. Having reviewed the record, the applicable law, and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Edward Morton appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of a residence located at 299 Picadome Park Drive in Lexington, Kentucky. Having reviewed the record, the applicable law, and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

United States v. Morton, 222 F. App'x 510 (6th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

222 F. App'x 510 (United States v. Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.