United States v. Morrison

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2008
Docket08-6812
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Morrison (United States v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Morrison, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6812

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENT MORRISON, a/k/a Righteous,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:98-cr-00337-PMD-1)

Submitted: November 5, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kent Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Eric John Klumb, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kent Morrison appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Morrison, No. 2:98-

cr-00337-PMD-1 (D.S.C. May 9, 2008). We deny Morrison’s motion

for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Morrison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morrison-ca4-2008.