United States v. Morris

643 F. App'x 259
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 2016·No. No. 15-7984·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Edward Morris appeals the district court’s order denying a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Morris’ motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. United States v. Morris, No. 5:14-cr-00103-1 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morris, 643 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2016).

643 F. App'x 259 (United States v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related