United States v. Morley

Opinion

Opinions of the United

1999 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

12-20-1999

United States v Morley Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 98-1894

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

Recommended Citation "United States v Morley" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 325. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/325

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Filed December 20, 1999

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 98-1894

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

MICHAEL J. MORLEY, II,

Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Criminal Action No. 97-cr-00430-2 District Judge: Hon. Robert F. Kelly

Argued: October 1, 1999

Before: MANSMANN, McKEE, Circuit Judges and STAPLETON, Senior Circuit Judge

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on December 8, 1999, be amended as follows:

On page 7, the sentence beginning with "However, in order for such . . ." that now begins immediately after the indented quotation should be changed to read as follows: "Evidence that meets the requirements of Rule 404(b) is relevant and therefore admissible unless excluded under Rule 403."

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge

DATED: December 20, 1999

A True Copy: Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit