United States v. Morita

73 M.J. 450, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 745

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Morita. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 M.J. 116 →

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided July 25, 2014·No. No. 14-5007/AF·Published

Opinion

CCA 37838. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THAT A RESERVIST CAN CREATE COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION BY FORGING ACTIVE DUTY ORDERS AND/OR INACTIVE-DUTY TRAINING ORDERS AND BY FINDING THAT COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION EXISTED FOR EACH 120-DAY PERIOD LISTED ON THE THREE APPLICATIONS FOR MPA MAN-DAY TOURS.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 37838. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THAT A RESERVIST CAN CREATE COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION BY FORGING ACTIVE DUTY ORDERS AND/OR INACTIVE-DUTY TRAINING ORDERS AND BY FINDING THAT COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION EXISTED FOR EACH 120-DAY PERIOD LISTED ON THE THREE APPLICATIONS FOR MPA MAN-DAY TOURS.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

United States v. Morita, 73 M.J. 450, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 745 (Ark. 2014).

Pincite

73 M.J. 450 (United States v. Morita) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.