United States v. Moran Sanchez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Moran Sanchez. Read the opinion of the Court — 436 F. App'x 918
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 3, 2011·No. 10-14648·Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUG 3, 2011 No. 10-14648 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________

D.C. Docket No.0:09-cr-60042-JIC-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CINDY MORAN-SANCHEZ,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________

(August 3, 2011)

Before CARNES, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed as Cindy Moran-Sanchez’s counsel for

purposes of her appeal, filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moran-Sanchez’s conviction and sentence

is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Moran Sanchez, (11th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Moran Sanchez (United States v. Moran Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)