United States v. Moran Sanchez
This text of United States v. Moran Sanchez (United States v. Moran Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUG 3, 2011 No. 10-14648 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________
D.C. Docket No.0:09-cr-60042-JIC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CINDY MORAN-SANCHEZ,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________
(August 3, 2011)
Before CARNES, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed as Cindy Moran-Sanchez’s counsel for
purposes of her appeal, filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Moran-Sanchez’s conviction and sentence
is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Moran Sanchez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-moran-sanchez-ca11-2011.