United States v. Morales-Franco

70 F. App'x 189
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 11, 2003
Docket02-41709
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 F. App'x 189 (United States v. Morales-Franco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Morales-Franco, 70 F. App'x 189 (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Jose Luis Morales-Franco pled guilty to a charge of being found unlawfully present in the United States after having been deported following convicted for a felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court lacked a proper basis for determining that his underlying conviction was a drug trafficking offense for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A). However, the abstract of judgment relied upon by the district court reflected that Morales-Franco was convicted of selling marijuana. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the preponderance of the evidence supported the assessment of the sentencing enhancement. See United States v. Herrera-Solorzano, 114 F.3d 48, 50 (5th Cir.1997).

As Morales-Franco concedes, his second argument is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). In the absence of any convincing argument, the sentence imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gutierrez-Ramirez
405 F.3d 352 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Morales-Franco v. United States
540 U.S. 1024 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 F. App'x 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morales-franco-ca5-2003.