United States v. Moorer

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 26, 2003
• Docket: 03-6752
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6752

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ETROY CARLOS MOORER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CR-97-43, CA-00-1002-2-12)

Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 26, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Etroy Carlos Moorer, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Etroy Carlos Moorer seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moorer

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029

(2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED