United States v. Moore

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 F. App'x 216
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2009·No. 08-8383·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8383

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1)

Submitted: April 8, 2009 Decided: April 17, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Moore appeals the district court’s order

denying Moore’s motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Moore, No. 1:97-cr-

00362-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 3, 2008; entered Sept. 4,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Moore, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Moore (United States v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related