United States v. Moore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8292
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENDRICK DWAYNE MOORE, a/k/a Kendrick Moore, a/k/a Kendrick Dwayne Rogers,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:06-cr-00641-HMH-2)
Submitted: April 2, 2009 Decided: April 10, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendrick Dwayne Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kendrick Dwayne Moore seeks to appeal the district
court’s text order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s
denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Moore (United States v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.