United States v. Moore

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 F. App'x 216
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2009·No. 08-8292·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8292

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENDRICK DWAYNE MOORE, a/k/a Kendrick Moore, a/k/a Kendrick Dwayne Rogers,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:06-cr-00641-HMH-2)

Submitted: April 2, 2009 Decided: April 10, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendrick Dwayne Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kendrick Dwayne Moore seeks to appeal the district

court’s text order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s

denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Moore, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Moore (United States v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related