United States v. Moody

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TERRENCE MOODY,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cr-00074-WDQ-9)

Submitted: July 29, 2010 Decided: August 12, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Moody, Appellant Pro Se. Kwame Jangha Manley, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terrence Moody appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Moody, No. 1:06-cr-00074-WDQ-9 (D. Md. May 21, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED