United States v. Montero-Camargo
192 F.3d 946, 1999 WL 979632
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 25, 1999·No. Nos. 97-50643, 97-50645·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Montero-Camargo, 177 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir.1999), is withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Montero-Camargo, 192 F.3d 946, 1999 WL 979632 (9th Cir. 1999).
192 F.3d 946 (United States v. Montero-Camargo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Boujaoude
56 F. App'x 816 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Julian Galindo-Gallegos, AKA Jose Reyes-Olague, AKA Aurelio Garcia-Chairez, AKA Jose Olague Reyes
244 F.3d 728 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen
192 F.3d 946 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)