United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen
This text of 183 F.3d 1172 (United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
183 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 1999)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GERMAN ESPINOZA MONTERO-CAMARGO, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LORENZO SANCHEZ-GUILLEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 97-50643, No. 97-50645
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted December 10, 1998--Pasadena, California
August 25, 1999
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. CR-96-2233-1-IEG, CR-96-2233-2-IEG.
Before: Alex Kozinski and Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, Circuit Judges, and Frank C. Damrell, Jr.,* District Judge.
ORDER
The slip opinion ("slip op.") filed May 13, 1999 is amended as follows:
1. At slip op. 4466, lines 22-23 of the text, delete "driving and the ethnicity of the occupants;" and replace with "driving, Mexicali license plates, the Hispanic appearance of the occupants,[FN1] and". Renumber subsequent footnotes.
[FN1]. Border Patrol agents may consider the Hispanic appearance of a motorist, but this fact alone does not justify an investigatory stop. See Brigoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 886-87 ("The likelihood that any given person of Mexican ancestry is an alien is high enough to make Mexican appearance a relevant factor, but standing alone it does not justify stopping all Mexican-Americans to ask if they are aliens").
2. At slip op. 4466, line 29 of the text, insert"," between "Garcia-Barron" and "116".
Notes:
The Honorable Frank C. Damrell, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 F.3d 1172, 52 Fed. R. Serv. 208, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 25499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-german-espinoza-montero-camargo-united-states-of-america-ca9-1999.