United States v. Montello Hood
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6214
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MONTELLO MARQUETTE HOOD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:10-cr-00707-JFA-1)
Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 23, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Montello Marquette Hood, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Montello Marquette Hood appeals from the district court’s order granting his motion
for reconsideration of its prior order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) motion. * We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hood, No. 0:10-cr-00707-JFA-1
(D.S.C. July 17, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court granted Hood’s motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he requested.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Montello Hood (United States v. Montello Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.