United States v. Montano
Opinion
Appellate Case: 23-2173 Document: 010111052163 Date Filed: 05/20/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT May 20, 2024 _________________________________ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 23-2173 (D.C. No. 1:20-CR-01479-KWR-1) DANIEL MONTANO, (D. N.M.)
Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________
Before McHUGH, EBEL, and CARSON, Circuit Judges. _________________________________
Daniel Montano pleaded guilty to possession of ammunition by a convicted
felon, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and received an 87-month prison sentence. He then
appealed from that sentence. His plea agreement contains an appeal waiver that the
government now moves to enforce under United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1328
(10th Cir. 2004) (en banc). In response, Montano’s counsel states he “has fully
discussed the government’s Motion with Mr. Montano, including his rights and
options in responding to it, and with Mr. Montano’s consent undersigned counsel
reports that Mr. Montano does not object to the government’s Motion.” Resp. at 1.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. Appellate Case: 23-2173 Document: 010111052163 Date Filed: 05/20/2024 Page: 2
In light of Montano’s non-opposition, we grant the government’s motion to
enforce and dismiss this appeal.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Montano (United States v. Montano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.