United States v. Mobley

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mobley

500 F. App'x 226

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. 12-7481·Published

Opinion

[227] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Mobley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mobley, No. 3:92-cr-00018-MOC-15 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[227] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Mobley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mobley, No. 3:92-cr-00018-MOC-15 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mobley, 500 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

500 F. App'x 226 (United States v. Mobley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related