United States v. Mitchell
This text of 11 C.M.A. 497 (United States v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
These accused were tried together before a general court-martial on charges of robbery, larceny, and unlawful detention, violations of Articles 122, 121, and 97, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 922, 921, and 897, respectively. Both pleaded guilty, and each was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for five years. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed, and thereafter we granted accused’s respective petitions for review limited to the single issue of whether their convictions under Article 97 of the Code, supra, may stand.
It appears from the record that neither of these accused was authorized to apprehend or arrest. In United States v Hardy, 11 USCMA 487, 29 CMR 303, this day decided, we rejected the argument that the Article was limited in its application to persons possessing that authority, and held that the statute proscribed such conduct by any person subject to the Code. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the above-cited case, we must resolve the granted issue adversely to these accused.
The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 C.M.A. 497, 11 USCMA 497, 29 C.M.R. 313, 1960 CMA LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mitchell-cma-1960.