United States v. Mitchell
This text of 420 F. App'x 296 (United States v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Shawnsy Devon Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Because his appeal is moot, we dismiss the appeal.
*297 Mitchell pleaded guilty in April 2003. He was sentenced to ninety months’ imprisonment and five years of supervised release. Mitchell served his active sentence and was released on November 18, 2009, while this appeal was in abeyance pending decision in another appeal. Because Mitchell has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, his argument that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for reduction of sentence is moot. *
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We deny Mitchell’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F. App'x 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mitchell-ca4-2011.