United States v. Mitchell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:90-cr-00020-2)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s

order granting in part and denying in part his motion for

reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-00020-2 (S.D.W.

Va. May 8, 2009). We deny Mitchell’s motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED