United States v. Mitchell

427 F. App'x 760
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 565 F.3d 1347
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 24, 2011·No. 10-10077·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Peter Warren Kenny, appointed counsel for Antwain Devon Mitchell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mitchell’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mitchell, 427 F. App'x 760 (11th Cir. 2011).

427 F. App'x 760 (United States v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)