United States v. Mitchell

406 F. App'x 453
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 30, 2010·No. No. 10-11795·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, the Federal Public Defender assigned to represent Vincent Mitchell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mitchell’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mitchell, 406 F. App'x 453 (11th Cir. 2010).

406 F. App'x 453 (United States v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vincent Vidal Mitchell v. United States
612 F. App'x 542 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)