United States v. Mission Support Alliance LLC

Opinion

2 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 Apr 30, 2021

4 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6

7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO: 4:19-CV-5021-RMP 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 10 MISSION SUPPORT ALLIANCE, LLC; LOCKHEED MARTIN 11 SERVICES, INC; LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION; and 12 JORGE FRANCISCO ARMIJO, Frank, 13 Defendants. 14

15 BEFORE THE COURT is a Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, 16 ECF No. 104. Having reviewed the Motion and the record, the Court finds good 17 cause to grant dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a). 18 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 19 1. The Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, ECF No. 104, is 20 GRANTED, subject to the terms and conditions of the Settlement 21 Agreement executed among the parties to this action on April 5, 2021. 1 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and without fees or 2 costs to any party.

3 3. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. 4 4. All scheduled court hearings, if any, are STRICKEN. 5 5. The Court retains jurisdiction of this case to enforce the terms of the

6 Settlement Agreement. See K.C. ex rel. Erica C. v. Torlakson, 762 F.3d 7 963, 967 (9th Cir. 2014) (to establish ancillary jurisdiction to enforce a 8 settlement agreement under Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 9 511 U.S. 375, 381–82 (1994), a court may either include a provision

10 retaining jurisdiction in the dismissal order or directly incorporate the 11 terms of the agreement into that order). 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this

13 Order, enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice, provide copies to counsel, and 14 close this case. 15 DATED April 30, 2021. 16 s/ Rosanna Malouf Peterson 17 ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON United States District Judge 18 19 20 21