United States v. Minkoff
This text of 181 F.2d 538 (United States v. Minkoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants’ motion asks that we remand this case to the district court in order that they may there seek a new trial for newly discovered evidence. Under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. 1 we should only entertain such a motion in case the district court indicates, after a hearing, that it intends to grant a motion for a new trial.
. Rakes v. United States, 4 Cir., 163 F.2d 771; Dession, New Rules of Criminal Procedure, 56 Yale L.J. (1947) 197, 232; N. Y. Univ. School of Law Institute-Proceedings, Vol. VI, p. 208.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 F.2d 538, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-minkoff-ca2-1950.