United States v. Minkoff

181 F.2d 538, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2647
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1950
Docket538
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 181 F.2d 538 (United States v. Minkoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Minkoff, 181 F.2d 538, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2647 (2d Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ motion asks that we remand this case to the district court in order that they may there seek a new trial for newly discovered evidence. Under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. 1 we should only entertain such a motion in case the district court indicates, after a hearing, that it intends to grant a motion for a new trial.

1

. Rakes v. United States, 4 Cir., 163 F.2d 771; Dession, New Rules of Criminal Procedure, 56 Yale L.J. (1947) 197, 232; N. Y. Univ. School of Law Institute-Proceedings, Vol. VI, p. 208.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Valentine
655 F. Supp. 731 (S.D. New York, 1987)
United States v. Guillette
404 F. Supp. 1360 (D. Connecticut, 1975)
United States v. Guildette
404 F. Supp. 1360 (D. Connecticut, 1975)
Sims v. State
495 P.2d 256 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1972)
United States v. Munchak
338 F. Supp. 1283 (S.D. New York, 1972)
United States v. Robert A. Frame, Jr.
454 F.2d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Gregory Comulada
340 F.2d 449 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Bankers Trust Co. v. United States
191 F. Supp. 792 (S.D. New York, 1961)
United States v. Vincent Pellegrino
273 F.2d 570 (Second Circuit, 1960)
United States v. West
170 F. Supp. 200 (N.D. Ohio, 1959)
United States v. Provoo
124 F. Supp. 185 (S.D. New York, 1954)
Metcalf v. United States
195 F.2d 213 (Sixth Circuit, 1952)
Zamloch v. United States
187 F.2d 854 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 F.2d 538, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-minkoff-ca2-1950.