United States v. Minero-Regalado

384 F. App'x 651

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Armando Minero-Re- galado appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Minero-Regalado contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. This contention is foreclosed because the record reflects that the district court did not err in concluding that his motion is barred by a valid waiver of the right to collaterally attack his conviction and sentence. See Washington v. Lampert, 422 F.3d 864, 869 (9th Cir.2005); see also White v. Klitzkie, 281 F.3d 920, 922 (9th Cir.2002) (this court may affirm the district court on any ground supported by the record even if that issue was not included in the certificate of appealability).

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.