United States v. Milton
This text of 328 F. App'x 609 (United States v. Milton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lisa Call, appointed counsel for Terrance Scott Milton in this appeal from the denial of Milton’s motion for a sentence reduction' pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the denial of Milton’s § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-milton-ca11-2009.