United States v. Mike Vallee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 24, 1997·No. 96-3122·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-3122SD

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District of v. * South Dakota.

*

Mike Vallee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

Submitted: June 6, 1997 Filed: June 24, 1997

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Mike Vallee appeals the district court's denial of Vallee's request to withdraw his guilty plea to sexual abuse of a minor. We review the district court's ruling for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Nichols, 986 F.2d 1199, 1201 (8th Cir. 1993). Having considered the record before us, we conclude Vallee failed to establish a fair and just reason for the withdrawal of his plea. Id. We decline to consider Vallee's ineffective assistance of counsel claims. These claims are best pursued on motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Jennings, 12 F.3d 836, 840 (8th Cir. 1994). We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mike Vallee, (8th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Mike Vallee (United States v. Mike Vallee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related