United States v. Miggins
This text of United States v. Miggins (United States v. Miggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7686
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRELL DORIAN MIGGINS, a/k/a Darrell Miggins,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00014-nkm-2)
Submitted: March 23, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell Dorian Miggins, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Darrell Dorian Miggins appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Miggins,
No. 3:00-cr-00014-nkm-2 (W.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2008). We deny
Miggins’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Miggins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-miggins-ca4-2009.