United States v. Midgette
This text of 675 F. App'x 356 (United States v. Midgette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jamadle Devon Midgette appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Midgette’s motion. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Midgette, No. 4:12-cr-00029-D-1, 2016 WL 6267965 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
675 F. App'x 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-midgette-ca4-2017.