United States v. Midgette

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Midgette

675 F. App'x 356

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2017·No. No. 16-7324·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamadle Devon Midgette appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Midgette’s motion. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Midgette, No. 4:12-cr-00029-D-1, 2016 WL 6267965 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamadle Devon Midgette appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Midgette’s motion. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Midgette, No. 4:12-cr-00029-D-1, 2016 WL 6267965 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Midgette, 675 F. App'x 356 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 356 (United States v. Midgette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related