United States v. Microsoft Corporation

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Microsoft Corporation

213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19134, 2000 WL 763598

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 13, 2000·No. 00-5212·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In view of the exceptional importance of these cases and the fact that the number of judges of this court disqualified from participation as a practical possibility precludes any en banc rehearing of a panel decision, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, by the en banc court that these cases and all motions and petitions filed in these cases be heard by the court sitting en banc. Parties shall hereafter file an original and nineteen copies of all pleadings and briefs submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In view of the exceptional importance of these cases and the fact that the number of judges of this court disqualified from participation as a practical possibility precludes any en banc rehearing of a panel decision, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, by the en banc court that these cases and all motions and petitions filed in these cases be heard by the court sitting en banc. Parties shall hereafter file an original and nineteen copies of all pleadings and briefs submitted.

United States v. Microsoft Corporation, 213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19134, 2000 WL 763598 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Pincite

213 F.3d 764 (United States v. Microsoft Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related