United States v. Microsoft Corporation

213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19134, 2000 WL 763598
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 2000
Docket00-5212
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 F.3d 764 (United States v. Microsoft Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Microsoft Corporation, 213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19134, 2000 WL 763598 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In view of the exceptional importance of these cases and the fact that the number of judges of this court disqualified from participation as a practical possibility precludes any en banc rehearing of a panel decision, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, by the en banc court that these cases and all motions and petitions filed in these cases be heard by the court sitting en banc. Parties shall hereafter file an original and nineteen copies of all pleadings and briefs submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re: Michael Flynn
973 F.3d 74 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19134, 2000 WL 763598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-microsoft-corporation-cadc-2000.