State of New York v. Microsoft Corporation

D.C. Circuit

State of New York v. Microsoft Corporation

213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19132

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 2000

Docket1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 F.3d 764 (State of New York v. Microsoft Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State of New York v. Microsoft Corporation, 213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19132 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

213 F.3d 764 (D.C. Cir. 2000)

State of New York, et al., Appellees
v.
Microsoft Corporation, Appellant

No. 00-5213 September Term, 1999

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

June 13, 2000

BEFORE: Edwards, Chief Judge; Silberman*, Williams, Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson^*, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel and Garland^*, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Per Curiam

In view of the exceptional importance of these cases and the fact that the number of judges of this court disqualified from participation as a practical possibility precludes any en banc rehearing of a panel decision, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, by the en banc court that these cases and all motions and petitions filed in these cases be heard by the court sitting en banc. Parties shall hereafter file an original and nineteen copies of all pleadings and briefs submitted.

Notes:

*

Circuit Judges Silberman, Henderson, and Garland took no part in the consideration and issuance of this order, and they will take no part in any future consideration of matters before the court involving these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI