United States v. Michel

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Michel

474 F. App'x 230

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2012·No. No. 12-6735·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adelson Michel appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Michel, No. 5:06-cr-00041-GEC-1 (W.D.Va. Apr. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adelson Michel appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Michel, No. 5:06-cr-00041-GEC-1 (W.D.Va. Apr. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Michel, 474 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 230 (United States v. Michel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related