United States v. Michael Kennedy
This text of United States v. Michael Kennedy (United States v. Michael Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7370
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL ANTHONY KENNEDY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:05-cr-00815-HMH-1)
Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Anthony Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Anthony Kennedy appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Kennedy’s application to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v.
Kennedy, No. 6:05-cr-00815-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2018); see also Pepper v. United
States, 562 U.S. 476, 491 (2011); United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280 (4th Cir. 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Michael Kennedy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-kennedy-ca4-2019.