United States v. Michael Carter
This text of United States v. Michael Carter (United States v. Michael Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6997 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6997
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 24-7175
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:17-cr-00351-JFA-1)
Submitted: May 15, 2025 Decided: May 20, 2025 USCA4 Appeal: 24-6997 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 2 of 3
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Kenny Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Michelle Stoughton, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 USCA4 Appeal: 24-6997 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/20/2025 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Michael Kenny Carter appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and denying his motion for
reconsideration. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Carter’s informal
briefs, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014), and
finding no reversible error, we deny Carter’s motions for a certificate of appealability and
for release pending appeal and affirm the district court’s orders, United States v. Carter,
No. 3:17-cr-00351-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 4 & Nov. 7, 2024). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Michael Carter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-carter-ca4-2025.