United States v. Michael

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2009·No. 09-6437·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6437

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KELLY DENISE MICHAEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00227-LHT-2)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelly Denise Michael, Appellant Pro Se. Corey F. Ellis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kelly Denise Michael appeals the district court’s

order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Michael, No.

1:06-cr-00227-LHT-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Michael, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Michael (United States v. Michael) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related