United States v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 12, 2025·No. 25-10509·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-10509 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-10509 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ December 12, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alec Mendoza,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:24-CR-45-1 ______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Alec Mendoza has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-10509 Document: 44-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/12/2025

No. 25-10509

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non- frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mendoza, (5th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Mendoza (United States v. Mendoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)