United States v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2023·No. 22-10568·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-10568 Document: 00516634135 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10568 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 3, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Gabriel Lee Mendoza,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:21-CR-96-14 ______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Gabriel Lee Mendoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10568 Document: 00516634135 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2023

No. 22-10568

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mendoza, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Mendoza (United States v. Mendoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)