United States v. Mendez

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Mendez

310 F. App'x 711

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2009·No. 08-40614·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

*712 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Guadalupe Mendez, Jr., presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-44 (5th Cir.1996), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *712 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

*712 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Guadalupe Mendez, Jr., presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-44 (5th Cir.1996), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *712 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Mendez, 310 F. App'x 711 (5th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

310 F. App'x 711 (United States v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related