United States v. Mendez

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Mendez

170 F. App'x 877

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mendez. Read the opinion of the Court — 431 F.3d 420 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2006·No. 05-50320·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed motion filed by Appellee to vacate sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unopposed motion filed by Appellee to remand case to the district court for resentencing is GRANTED.

In granting the unopposed motion of the United States, this court expresses no opinion on the government’s interpretation of United States v. Hamilton, 440 F.3d 693 (5th Cir.2006).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed motion filed by Appellee to vacate sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unopposed motion filed by Appellee to remand case to the district court for resentencing is GRANTED.

In granting the unopposed motion of the United States, this court expresses no opinion on the government’s interpretation of United States v. Hamilton, 440 F.3d 693 (5th Cir.2006).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Mendez, 170 F. App'x 877 (5th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

170 F. App'x 877 (United States v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related