United States v. Menchaca-Moreno

115 F. App'x 274
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. No. 04-50668·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfonso Menchaca-Moreno raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense, and by United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir.2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), does not apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Menchaca-Moreno, 115 F. App'x 274 (5th Cir. 2004).

115 F. App'x 274 (United States v. Menchaca-Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez-Antuna v. United States
544 U.S. 1015 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Cruz v. United States
544 U.S. 1013 (Supreme Court, 2005)