United States v. Medellin

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2005·No. 04-20003·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20003 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANNY MEDELLIN, also known as DJ Storm,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-830-6 --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Danny Medellin on appeal has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed both an original and

supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Medellin has filed a pro se response. Our

independent review of counsel’s briefs, Medellin’s pro se

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Medellin, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Medellin (United States v. Medellin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)