United States v. Medellin
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20003 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANNY MEDELLIN, also known as DJ Storm,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-830-6 --------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Danny Medellin on appeal has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed both an original and
supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Medellin has filed a pro se response. Our
independent review of counsel’s briefs, Medellin’s pro se
response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Medellin (United States v. Medellin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.