United States v. Medellin
This text of 135 F. App'x 742 (United States v. Medellin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel appointed to represent Danny Medellin on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed both an original and supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Medellin has filed a pro se response. Our independent review of counsel’s briefs, Medellin’s pro se response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is [743]*743GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 F. App'x 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-medellin-ca5-2005.