United States v. McSwain

252 F. App'x 574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McSwain. Read the opinion of the Court — 207 F. App'x 355
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2007·No. 07-4081·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marcus A. McSwain pled guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (2000), pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). On appeal, he challenges the district court’s imposition of the statutory maximum sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment.

We find that the district court properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines and considered the relevant sentencing factors before imposing the 120-month sentence. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). Additionally, we find that the sentence imposed was reasonable. See United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d 339, 341 (4th Cir.2006); Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462-69, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) (upholding presumption of reasonableness accorded within-guidelines sentence). Accordingly, we affirm McSwain’s sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McSwain, 252 F. App'x 574 (4th Cir. 2007).

252 F. App'x 574 (United States v. McSwain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Carolina v. Alford
400 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Rita v. United States
551 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. Artez Lamont Johnson
445 F.3d 339 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)