United States v. McQuinn
Opinion
Atarah McQuinn appeals the district court’s order denying McQuinn’s motion to modify her term of imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McQuinn, No. 3:02-cr-00095-REP (E.D.Va. Apr. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *95 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
235 F. App'x 94 (United States v. McQuinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.