United States v. McNeill

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8222

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEITH DARNELL MCNEILL, a/k/a No Doubt,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:08-cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Darnell McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keith Darnell McNeill appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying the motion. See United States v. Munn, __ F.3d __,

2010 WL 546486, at *3 (4th Cir. Feb. 17, 2010) (No. 09-7525).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for the

reasons stated there. See United States v. McNeill, No. 4:08-

cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2009). Further, we deny

McNeill’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED