United States v. McNeair
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6232
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY DENNARD MCNEAIR,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (4:96-cr-00070-JAB-1)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Dennard McNeair, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina; Paul Alexander Weinman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Dennard McNeair appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. McNeair, No. 4:96-cr-
00070-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. McNeair (United States v. McNeair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.